Cube under the Constant Stresses throughout the Volume

Objective: Check of the obtained values of the constant stresses throughout the volume of the cube at an irregular coarse finite element mesh.

Initial data files:

File name

Description

Patch_test_Constant_stress_Solid_32.SPR

Design model with the elements of type 32

Patch_test_Constant_stress_Solid_34.SPR

Design model with the elements of type 34

Patch_test_Constant_stress_Solid_36.SPR

Design model with the elements of type 36

Patch_test_Constant_stress_Solid_37.SPR

Design model with the elements of type 37

Problem formulation: The unit isotropic cube is subjected to the displacements of the external surfaces providing the conditions of the constant stresses throughout the volume. Check that the conditions of constant normal σx, σy, σz and tangential τxy, τxz, τyz stresses throughout the volume are provided.

References: R. H. Macneal, R. L. Harder, A proposed standard set of problems to test finite element accuracy, North-Holland, Finite elements in analysis and design, 1, 1985, p. 3-20.

Initial data:

E = 1.0·106 kPa - elastic modulus of the plate material;
ν = 0.25 - Poisson’s ratio;
a = 1.00 m - side of the cube;
Boundary conditions:  
u = 10-3∙(2∙x + y + z)/2 - displacement of the external surfaces along the X axis of the global coordinate system;
v = 10-3∙(x + 2∙y + z)/2 - displacement of the external surfaces along the Y axis of the global coordinate system;
w = 10-3∙(x + y + 2∙z)/2 - displacement of the external surfaces along the Z axis of the global coordinate system;

 

Location of internal nodes of the finite element mesh:

Numbers of nodes

in the Figure 1

x

y

z

1

0.35

0.35

0.35

2

0.75

0.25

0.25

3

0.85

0.85

0.15

4

0.25

0.75

0.25

5

0.35

0.35

0.65

6

0.75

0.25

0.75

7

0.85

0.85

0.85

8

0.25

0.75

0.75

 

Finite element model: Design model – general type system. Four design models are considered:

Model 1 - 42 four-node pyramid elements of type 32. Boundary conditions are provided by imposing constraints on the nodes of the external surfaces of the cube in the directions of the degrees of freedom X, Y, Z and their displacement in accordance with the specified values u, v, w. Number of nodes in the model – 16.

Model 2 - 14 six-node isoparametric solid elements of type 34. Boundary conditions are provided by imposing constraints on the nodes of the external surfaces of the cube in the directions of the degrees of freedom X, Y, Z and their displacement in accordance with the specified values u, v, w.  Number of nodes in the model – 16.

Model 3 - 7 eight-node isoparametric solid elements of type 36. Boundary conditions are provided by imposing constraints on the nodes of the external surfaces of the cube in the directions of the degrees of freedom X, Y, Z and their displacement in accordance with the specified values u, v, w.  Number of nodes in the model – 16.

Model 4 - 7 twenty-node isoparametric solid elements of type 37. Boundary conditions are provided by imposing constraints on the nodes of the external surfaces of the cube in the directions of the degrees of freedom X, Y, Z and their displacement in accordance with the specified values u, v, w.  Number of nodes in the model – 48.

 

Results in SCAD


Model 1. Design and deformed models

 


Model 2. Design and deformed models

 


Model 3. Design and deformed models

 


Model 4. Design and deformed models

 


Values of normal stresses for all models σx, σy σz (kN/m2)

 


Values of tangential stresses for all models τxz, τxy, τyz (kN/m2)

 

 

Comparison of solutions:

Model

Parameter

Theory

SCAD

Deviation, %

1-4

Normal stresses

σx, kN/m2

2000

2000

0.00

Normal stresses

σy, kN/m2

2000

2000

0.00

Normal stresses

σz, kN/m2

2000

2000

0.00

Tangential stresses

τxy, kN/m2

400

400

0.00

Tangential stresses

τxz, kN/m2

400

400

0.00

Tangential stresses

τyz, kN/m2

400

400

0.00

 

Notes: In the analytical solution the normal σx, σy, σz and tangential τxy, τxz, τyz stresses throughout the volume of the cube are determined according to the following formulas:

\[ \sigma_{x} =10^{-3}\cdot \frac{E}{1-2\cdot \nu }; \quad \sigma_{y} =10^{-3}\cdot \frac{E}{1-2\cdot \nu }; \quad \sigma_{z} =10^{-3}\cdot \frac{E}{1-2\cdot \nu }; \] \[ \tau_{xy} =10^{-3}\cdot \frac{E}{2\cdot \left( {1+\nu } \right)}; \quad \tau_{xz} =10^{-3}\cdot \frac{E}{2\cdot \left( {1+\nu } \right)}; \quad \tau_{yz} =10^{-3}\cdot \frac{E}{2\cdot \left( {1+\nu } \right)}. \]