Determination of Stress-Strain State Taking into Account Genetic Nonlinearity (“Erection” Mode)
Objective: Comparison of the results of the calculations of the stress-strain state of a bar structure taking into account genetic nonlinearity performed by SCAD and the analytical solution.
Initial data file: Truss.MPR
Problem formulation:
References: A.V.Perelmuter, Control of the Behavior of Load-Bearing Structures (2-nd edition revised and supplemented) , Moscow: ASV, 2011, § 5.2.
Initial data:
The final model of the analyzed structure is given in the figure (linear dimensions in meters), and some additional information is given in the table. Element 11 shown with a dotted line in this figure was added temporarily and was not included in the final configuration.
Bar |
Stiffness |
---|---|
numbers |
ЕА, t |
1 |
10 |
2 |
10 |
3 |
10 |
4 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
6 |
2 |
7 |
2 |
8 |
4 |
9 |
5 |
10 |
5 |
11 |
25 |
12 |
10 |
13 |
10 |
The sequence of operations for achieving the prestressing is shown in the figure below.
Finite element model:
The structure is modeled by bar elements of general type 1.
The dimension of the complete model is 8 nodes and 13 finite elements.
Modeling of the building erection process consists of the following stages:
Stage |
Description of operations |
---|---|
1 |
Forced shortening of the bar 6 (dislocation d6= 0,001 m) and suspension of the ballast weight G6=10 t in the node 6. |
2 |
Attachment of the bar 12 to the system |
3 |
Removal of the bar 11 performed by the program in two stages: replacement of the effect of the bar by forces S11, which it transfers to the rest of the system (see. 3а), and application of the “compensating” load to the system ̶ S11 (see. 3b). Installation of the ballast weight G1=10 t in the node 1. |
4 |
Attachment of the bar 13 to the system |
Working |
Removal of the ballast weights G1 and G6 and loading the system by the live load Q1=Q3=Q5=2. |
Comparison of solutions:
Parameter |
Results |
Deviations, % |
|
---|---|---|---|
Theory |
SCAD |
||
Stage 1: Vertical displacement of the node 6, cm |
-17,078 |
-17,042 |
0,21 |
Force in the element 2, t |
-2,510 |
-2,500 |
0,40 |
Stage 2: Vertical displacement of the node 6, cm |
-17,078 |
-17,042 |
0,21 |
Force in the element 2, t |
-2,510 |
-2,500 |
0,40 |
Stage 3: Vertical displacement of the node 6, cm |
-28,220 |
-28,185 |
0,12 |
Force in the element 2, t |
4,990 |
5,000 |
-0,20 |
Stage 4: Vertical displacement of the node 6, cm |
-28,220 |
-28,185 |
0,12 |
Force in the element 2, t |
4,990 |
5,000 |
-0,20 |
Working stage Vertical displacement of the node 6, cm |
1,257 |
1,293 |
0,21 |
Force in the element 2, t |
5,559 |
5,61 |
0,91 |
Note: There are arithmetic errors in the source. The comparison of solutions was made on the basis of the corrected calculations reported by the author.