Determination of Stress-Strain State Taking into Account Genetic Nonlinearity (“Erection” Mode)

Objective: Comparison of the results of the calculations of the stress-strain state of a bar structure taking into account genetic nonlinearity performed by SCAD and the analytical solution.

Initial data file:  Truss.MPR

Problem formulation:

References: A.V.Perelmuter, Control of the Behavior of Load-Bearing Structures (2-nd edition revised and supplemented) , Moscow: ASV, 2011, § 5.2.

Initial data:

The final model of the analyzed structure is given in the figure (linear dimensions in meters), and some additional information is given in the table. Element 11 shown with a dotted line in this figure was added temporarily and was not included in the final configuration.

Bar

Stiffness

numbers

ЕА, t

1

10

2

10

3

10

4

10

5

10

6

2

7

2

8

4

9

5

10

5

11

25

12

10

13

10

 

The sequence of operations for achieving the prestressing is shown in the figure below.

Finite element model:

The structure is modeled by bar elements of general type 1.
The dimension of the complete model is 8 nodes and 13 finite elements.
Modeling of the building erection process consists of the following stages:

Stage

Description of operations

1

Forced shortening of the bar 6 (dislocation d6= 0,001 m) and suspension of the ballast weight G6=10 t in the node 6.

2

Attachment of the bar 12 to the system

3

Removal of the bar 11 performed by the program in two stages: replacement of the effect of the bar by forces S11, which it transfers to the rest of the system (see. 3а), and application of the “compensating” load to the system  ̶  S11 (see. 3b). Installation of the ballast weight G1=10 t in the node 1.

4

Attachment of the bar 13 to the system

Working

Removal of the ballast weights G1 and G6 and loading the system by the live load Q1=Q3=Q5=2.

 

Comparison of solutions:

Parameter

Results

Deviations, %

Theory

SCAD

Stage 1:

     Vertical displacement of the node 6, cm

-17,078

-17,042

0,21

     Force in the element 2, t

-2,510

-2,500

0,40

Stage 2:

     Vertical displacement of the node 6, cm

-17,078

-17,042

0,21

     Force in the element 2, t

-2,510

-2,500

0,40

Stage 3:

     Vertical displacement of the node 6, cm

-28,220

-28,185

0,12

     Force in the element 2, t

4,990

5,000

-0,20

Stage 4:

     Vertical displacement of the node 6, cm

-28,220

-28,185

0,12

     Force in the element 2, t

4,990

5,000

-0,20

Working stage 

     Vertical displacement of the node 6, cm

1,257

1,293

0,21

     Force in the element 2, t

5,559

5,61

0,91

 

Note: There are arithmetic errors in the source. The comparison of solutions was made on the basis of the corrected calculations reported by the author.